Excavated bronze sculpture Qin Xi Chui Ming in the hill, "Qin" problem. Qin Xi Chui Ming bronze hill by a succession of information disclosure, as "Qin" problem-depth study provides a new basis. Ancient literature should be content with the device Ming combine to determine the identity of Qin; again based on the artifacts displayed time. Contact the tomb of Qin tomb for public inspection. Why explore the Qin people. Besides, in ancient China, sheep bronze figurines implies auspiciousness. Qin unified interpretation of the idea for it is wrong. Qin Ming in the different sub-device is not one. Tomb of two large sacrificial pits of the instrument bell, technetium-ming of the Qin, when the Qin Xiangong; Macao Gui Zhen Qin Zhai cover the possession of the Qin-ming, when the Qin Wugong; and handed down a few pieces of Ge, spear and a newly discovered inscription in Ge Qin. When the Prince of wengong static public. But "child" in terms of the MG name.
The situation is more complicated. Because "the child" who does not necessarily "Qin" problem, has long aroused the concern of scholars. This is a replica of the antique bronze sculpture from Warring States Period (457B.C. ~ 221 B.C.). Because there are inscriptions of bronze weapons handed in, there are a few main device as "Qin" Ge, spear. The monarch. Yang Wen-Ju, "Qin Ge Ming", "first made Qin, Gongzu per use", for example. To permit Qinjun "public, and said the child." But why must the children know that this Qin Qin Jun? Yang certainly aware of the weakness of this evidence exists. Therefore, Li Xueqin in the text, Huangsheng Zhang, Wang Hui, Chen Ping, Liang Yun and other scholars of the era artifacts and device status are the main influential views published.
since the 1990s. Li County, Gansu Province since the discovery of the hole big Baozi mountains and the continuous disclosure of information artifacts. "Qin" problem to re-enter it as solemnly declared the end of "respect for the child or the United States known as the" Grand name with the "child" with the words, "this without the recognition, meaning scholars can know the heart Seoul." The candle holders is the Grade One cultural relic of China. If the said person is not necessarily Qin Qin Jun, referring to the object is more broad, then, to determine the device Ming Ye, a new round of start again in a deeper level. Emerging with the inscription, "Qin" various types of bronze, with bell, Cuan, Gui, Ge, etc.: Many inscriptions longer, for the analysis of the test questions provides more evidence. Some of them formally identify products, and some, though not to explore products.
But for large Baozi mountain hole has been recognized by scholars; for the individual objects of unknown land. Scholars examine the integration of information. More than that out of the tomb also likely. Why do people in the difficulty of Qin, is bound to increase. Another difficult associated with the difficult is. The original bronze sculpture children was found in Shaanxi province, China, in 1967. Various devices in the Qin Ming is not the same person? Those objects of the era. As previously described. Scholars have advocated an early spring; but the so-called early. Time span of at least three or four years. In memory of this time had called in the Qin people.
In particular, replacing more frequently in the Throne Qin circumstances may more than one. But the scholars seem to participate in the discussions together have a tendency to want to simplify the problem, we assume that all devices in the Qin-ming as the same person. Realistically speaking, this assumption is based is not sufficient. Shape and ornamentation of bronze objects in the four decades it is difficult to see the difference in the past. Ming with these objects alone, "Qin" objects of the era. The bronze garden statues is now preserved at Shaanxi Museum. Everyone's view is very similar. Are judged to be the early spring. Main disagreement is in the device whose main Qin issue. Uncertain because many factors affect judgments. Such as understanding the identity of Qin, who can be called "child" and dubbed the country name?
No comments:
Post a Comment